Overactive Victimhood

One of our cultural contagions is overactive victimhood. Everyone is a victim of something and, once a victim, always a victim. This isn’t to deny longstanding results of being sinned against, or even the existence of permanent scars. It is to say that a person’s identity does not need to be in victimness.

Christians should be able to show how this is done and to provide a way to talk about identity according to the gospel.

When Jesus saves, He saves us into a new identity. Peter wrote:

Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. (1 Peter 2:10)

Salvation changes our status. It gives us a testimony, and that testimony doesn’t deny the past. Our testimony acknowledges the past as the past on the way to affirming what is true now. We were lost, now we’re found. We we’re blind, now we see. We were dead, He has made us alive. We remember where we were in order to rejoice in who we are.

Of course we were not the only victim in our testimony. We were also the offenders in a previous situation. In order for our offense to be forgiven, Jesus had to die. Jesus will always be known as the sacrificial victim, but the victim who volunteered and who won. He is the “Lamb standing as though it had been slain” (Revelation 5:6). We will never forget His suffering, but His suffering will forever be a cause, not of sadness, but of celebration. His sacrifice purchased our eternal life. It belongs with His mercy that caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead.

We are the house of the Lord. We are His dwelling place, an assembly of those who have received mercy by the blood of the Lamb, and God is pleased to eat with us.


  1. Vitaliy Pelikhatyy said:

    Hey Sean, how would you respond to someone who having learned of the Christian doctrine of original sin, asks, “aren’t we a victim of their actions?”

    January 8, 2016
    • Sean Higgins said:

      Hi, Vitaliy. I’m not sure exactly how to answer. Are you asking something like this:

      I sinned against a brother in Christ who had heard me teach about original sin. Couldn’t he say that he was a victim of my sin?

      And I’d say Yes, for sure. However, my sin against him doesn’t make his status as a victim permanent (since we said he was a Christian) any more than my sin against Christ limits His identity only to being a victim.

      If I misunderstood your question, do clarify and I’ll see if I can answer better.

      January 12, 2016
      • Vitaliy Pelikhatyy said:

        Hey Sean, thanks for the response. Sorry didn’t respond sooner…for some reason your website wasn’t letting me. What I had in mind was a little different. Original sin is something we inherited from Adam, we are “victims” of his wrongdoing. It’s as if we “didn’t have a say” in inheriting a sinful nature. So, if someone challenges you about teaching on original sin, saying that they’re a “victim” of what Adam did. It is not their fault, but his. How would you respond? Does that make a little more sense?

        January 20, 2016

Leave a Reply